AI Cloud
- Cloud Native Product Development
- Cloud Native FaaS
- Monolith to Microservices
- DevSecOps as a Service
- Kubernetes Zero Downtime
Introduction: Why Kubernetes Performance and Cost Matter
Understanding the Performance–Cost Tradeoff in Kubernetes
Core Kubernetes Architecture and Cost Drivers
Resource Requests and Limits: The Foundation of Optimisation
Right-Sizing Pods and Workloads
CPU Performance Optimisation Techniques
Memory Management and Avoiding OOM Killers
Autoscaling Strategies: HPA, VPA, and Cluster Autoscaler
Node Optimisation and Instance Selection
Networking Performance and Cost Considerations
Storage Optimisation in Kubernetes
Monitoring, Observability, and Cost Visibility
FinOps Best Practices for Kubernetes
Common Kubernetes Cost Optimisation Mistakes
A Practical Optimisation Checklist
FAQs (10 Questions & Answers)
Final Thoughts
Kubernetes has become the default orchestration platform for modern cloud-native applications. It offers flexibility, scalability, and resilience that traditional infrastructure simply cannot match. But this power comes with a hidden cost both literal and operational.
Many teams move to Kubernetes expecting automatic efficiency, only to discover ballooning cloud bills and unpredictable performance. Clusters grow faster than workloads. Nodes sit idle. Pods request more resources than they use. Performance issues appear during peak traffic, even though plenty of capacity exists.
This is why Kubernetes performance and cost optimisation is no longer optional. It is a core operational skill.
Optimising Kubernetes is not about cutting corners. It is about using exactly what you need, no more and no less, while maintaining reliability and speed. This guide is designed to be practical, battle-tested, and grounded in real-world engineering practices.
In Kubernetes, performance and cost are deeply connected. Over-provisioning resources may improve performance in the short term but will destroy cost efficiency. Under-provisioning saves money initially but leads to throttling, crashes, and poor user experience.
Every optimisation decision lives on a spectrum:
More CPU means faster execution but higher cost
More memory reduces garbage collection pressure but increases spend
More replicas improve availability but multiply infrastructure usage
The goal of Kubernetes cost optimization is balance, not minimisation.
High-performing clusters are not the largest clusters. They are the best-aligned clusters, where resource supply matches real workload demand.
Understanding this tradeoff is the foundation of every optimisation strategy discussed in this guide.
Before tuning anything, you need to understand where Kubernetes actually spends money.
Worker Nodes: Compute instances are the largest cost contributor
Idle Capacity: Unused CPU and memory still cost money
Over-provisioned Pods: Inflated requests block efficient scheduling
Storage Volumes: Persistent volumes often grow unchecked
Network Egress: Cross-zone and outbound traffic add up quickly
Kubernetes itself does not cost money. Your infrastructure choices do.
Performance issues often arise not from lack of resources, but from poor scheduling caused by incorrect resource declarations.
Resource requests and limits are the most important and most misconfigured part of Kubernetes.
Requests define what a pod needs to be scheduled. The scheduler uses these values to place pods on nodes.
Limits define the maximum resources a container can consume.
When requests are too high:
Pods get stuck pending
Nodes appear “full” while being mostly idle
Costs increase unnecessarily
When limits are too low:
CPU throttling occurs
Containers get OOMKilled
Performance becomes unpredictable
Set requests close to average usage
Set limits slightly above peak usage
Never leave requests empty in production
This single practice can reduce Kubernetes cloud costs by 30–50%.
Right-sizing is the process of aligning declared resources with actual usage.
Reduces CPU throttling
Improves scheduling efficiency
Prevents noisy neighbor issues
Frees unused capacity
Enables bin-packing on fewer nodes
Reduces autoscaler churn
Monitor real CPU and memory usage over time
Identify consistently underutilized pods
Adjust requests downward gradually
Validate performance under load
Right-sizing should be continuous, not a one-time exercise.
CPU is a compressible resource in Kubernetes, which means performance degrades gracefully but silently.
CPU throttling due to low limits
Burstable pods competing for cycles
Uneven core distribution across nodes
Use Guaranteed QoS for latency-sensitive workloads
Avoid setting CPU limits for batch jobs
Prefer multiple smaller pods over one large pod
Align pod CPU requests with application concurrency
High CPU performance does not require high CPU allocation—just correct allocation.
Memory is not compressible. When it’s gone, your pod is gone.
Setting memory limits too close to peak usage
Ignoring application-level memory leaks
Running JVMs without container-aware settings
Leave headroom between request and limit
Use memory profiling tools
Enable container-aware JVM flags
Monitor RSS, not just heap usage
Memory optimisation is often the fastest way to improve both stability and cost efficiency.
Autoscaling is where performance and cost optimisation truly meet.
Scales pods based on CPU, memory, or custom metrics
Best for stateless workloads
Adjusts requests automatically
Excellent for batch and backend services
Use in recommendation mode first
Adds or removes nodes based on scheduling demand
Prevents over-provisioned clusters
Scale pods first, nodes second.
Autoscaling without right-sizing simply scales waste faster.
Choosing the wrong instance type can double your costs overnight.
Use multiple node pools for different workloads
Separate memory-heavy and CPU-heavy applications
Prefer newer generation instances
Use spot or preemptible nodes for fault-tolerant workloads
Well-designed node pools dramatically improve Kubernetes performance tuning outcomes.
Networking is often ignored until bills spike.
Cross-zone traffic
Unnecessary service mesh overhead
Chatty microservices
Co-locate services where possible
Reduce network hops
Avoid overusing ingress controllers
Optimising network paths improves latency and reduces egress costs.
Persistent storage quietly drains budgets.
Oversized PVCs
Unused volumes
Expensive default storage classes
Right-size volumes
Use dynamic provisioning carefully
Monitor IOPS usage
Archive or delete unused data
Storage optimisation is slow, but the savings are long-term and stable.
You cannot optimise what you cannot see.
CPU throttling
Memory usage vs limits
Pod restart counts
Node utilisation
Cost per namespace
Combine performance monitoring with cost dashboards for real insight.
FinOps brings financial accountability to engineering teams.
Shared ownership of costs
Visibility by team and service
Continuous optimisation
Tag resources, allocate costs by namespace, and review spend regularly.
Kubernetes cost optimisation is as much cultural as it is technical.
Relying solely on autoscaling
Ignoring idle resources
Treating dev and prod clusters the same
Overusing managed add-ons
Never revisiting resource configurations
Avoiding these mistakes often delivers instant savings.
✅ Set requests and limits for every pod
✅ Right-size workloads quarterly
✅ Use HPA with meaningful metrics
✅ Separate node pools by workload type
✅ Monitor cost per namespace
✅ Remove unused volumes and services
It is the practice of improving application performance while minimizing infrastructure waste by aligning resources with actual usage.
Because of over-provisioned resources, idle nodes, and incorrect autoscaling configurations.
Requests reserve capacity. Inflated requests lead to unused but paid-for resources.
No. Autoscaling without right-sizing often increases waste.
Right-sizing CPU and memory requests.
Yes for memory, selectively for CPU depending on workload type.
At least quarterly, or after major traffic changes.
Yes, for stateless and fault-tolerant workloads.
It reveals unused capacity and performance bottlenecks.
Absolutely when optimised correctly.
Kubernetes does not automatically optimise itself. It provides the tools, but the responsibility lies with engineers.
True Kubernetes performance and cost optimisation is not about aggressive cost cutting. It is about precision engineering, continuous learning, and disciplined operations.
When done right, Kubernetes delivers what it promises: scalability, reliability, and efficiency without surprise bills.
Kubeify's team decrease the time it takes to adopt open source technology while enabling consistent application environments across deployments... letting our developers focus on application code while improving speed and quality of our releases.
– Yaron Oren, Founder Maverick.ai (acquired by OutboundWorks)
Let us know what you are working on?
We would help you to build a
fault tolerant, secure and scalable system over kubernetes.